I cut a whole CD with it using Sample Tank2 as well as multiple live instrument tracks and a massive amount of vocal tracks. My old computer using Windows SX and a whopping 2 GB RAM (laugh) operated without a hitch. Can barely play through a short 15 second passage without it sounding like a hacked digital mess. Add a vocal track to a basic drum, piano and bass tracks and try to play with Vocal Synth and the performance is pathetic. So I start laying down some Sampletank tracks and low and behold…Cubase can barely keep up with even 3 tracks of sampletank. Watched videos on the Isotope products and saw producers with their pro-tools rigs on youtube just realtime blowing through all the powerful features of these products with massive amounts of tracks without so much as a hickup. So finally got everything together and running on a 64 bit platform (midi controller, audio interface etc.) and was excited to kick some ass with this new, incredibly powerful computer. I was relieved that Cubase 5 ran in 64 bit as, having read a few posts in regards to it, many say it is still an amazing program even though it isn’t supported by Steinberg anymore. ![]() Being that Cubase 5 can run as 64 bit I installed Cubase 5 (64 bit), updated my Sampletank2 to Sampletank3 (64bit), got some new tools like Isotope Vocal Synth and Nectar2 Suite, and some other mastering software etc. I was one of the original Cubase users and so had upgraded from the first iteration to Cubase 3 and lastly Cubase 5 so have invested a bit of cash through the years. So I’ve parked my music production for a number of years and finally got the bug back so bought an 8th gen i7, 256 ssd, 2TB hhd, 16gb DDR4 RAM Desktop computer.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |